The outcome demonstrated degrees of PCM somewhat influenced by the sort of dating ( H (2) = ; p =

In the first, the partnership between PCM and you may NCM is examined plus it was found that PCM ( Yards = ; DP = ) correlates negatively toward NCM ( Yards = ; DP = ); p =

Notice. PCM = Determination to possess self-confident childbirth; NCM = Motivation for negative childbirth; Mann-Whitney “U”; PSest = Odds of superiority directory.

PCM levels demonstrated zero differences between people that was basically matchmaking and those who was basically partnered or in a steady union ( U = 29; p =

Statistically significant differences with small effect sizes were found in PCM in three categories tested: occupation ( U = 37; p = .035; PS _est = .47), presence/absence of partner ( U = 10; p = .000; PS _est = .29) and presence/absence of children ( U = 21; p = .002; PS _est = .44). It was observed that the participants who were unemployed ( Mdn = ), who had one or more children ( Mdn = ) and who were in a relationship ( Mdn = ); had significantly higher levels of PCM than people who worked ( Mdn = ), who had no children ( Mdn = ) and who did not have a relationship ( Mdn = ).

On the other hand, NCM indicated statistically significant differences with small effect sizes related to sex ( U = 19; p = .000; PS _est = .43) and the presence/absence of children ( U = 10; p = .000; PS _est = .34). It was observed that both women ( Mdn = ) as for the participants who do not have children ( Mdn = ) have significantly higher levels of NCM than men ( Mdn = ) and participants with children ( Mdn = ).

Based on the results obtained in the comparison between people who are or are not in a stable relationship, we tested the possible differences in PCM according to the type of relationship using the Kruskal Wallis test. 000). Mann-Whitney tests were used to follow up on this finding. A Bonferroni correction was applied and all effects were tested at the .02 level. 039; PS _est = .47). https://kissbrides.com/russian-women/kaliningrad/ However, statistically significant differences were found in PCM levels between married and in a stable union ( U = 5; p = .000; PS _est = .41), of which married people ( Mdn = ) had higher levels of PCM when compared to people who were in a stable union ( Mdn = ).

Two Spearman correlations was conducted. 000; roentgen = -.494; r dos = .twenty four. On the next investigation the fresh relationships ranging from PCM, NCM and you will 16 personal and you will contextual details had been checked and can be seen in Table dos. Poor relationships was located both positive and negative ranging from PCM otherwise NCM and a dozen of the parameters examined. Particularly the fresh new sociodemographic details: “number of siblings” and “beginning purchase” in addition to personality things: “conscientiousness” and you may “openness playing” displayed zero tall correlations with PCM and NCM.

As a result of the correlations located, one or two several regressions was in fact did to understand and that details might be considered as predictor parameters regarding PCM and NCM in the modern try (Desk step 3).

The new activities presented for the Dining table step three was statistically significant and you can said 24% of the total variance away from PCM and ten% of NCM. Eight of your 14 parameters reviewed presented on their own while the tall predictors away from PCM. The fresh variables: religiosity, with or otherwise not which have college students, and you may ages displayed stronger matchmaking that have PCM, getting coefficients off ? = .thirty-two, ? = -.22 and you may ? = .17, respectively. Concerning your NCM, just four of twelve variables surveyed demonstrated themselves given that predictor parameters. The new details with or not having youngsters (? = .17), age (? = .14), religiosity (? = -.12) and you may sex (? = .10) displayed healthier relationship with the NCM.